Model comparison

Grok 3 vs Hy4 preview

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.6 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Grok 3 xAI

39.6

Rank #150 Confirmed

Hy4 preview Tencent

44.6

Rank #73 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Hy4 preview leads 54.5 to 36.2.
  • Hy4 preview has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 3 and Hy4 preview specifications
Grok 3Hy4 preview
ProviderxAITencent
Noometry Index39.644.6
Released2025-04-092026-08-28
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—64K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.83
Output $ / M tokens—$2.50
Results tracked403

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy4 preview leads

Grok 3: 41.5 (#113), Hy4 preview: 51.4 (#36)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Hy4 preview
Aider Polyglot53.3%—
LMArena WebDev—1633
WeirdML37.2%—
LMArena Coding1432—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 3: 30.2 (#69), Hy4 preview: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Hy4 preview
BALROG29.5%—

Reasoning Hy4 preview leads

Grok 3: 13.8 (#322), Hy4 preview: 30.6 (#75)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Hy4 preview
ARC-AGI-20%—
SimpleBench36.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark61.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)—68.2%
ARC-AGI-15.5%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1433—
Epoch Capabilities Index138.34—

Math Hy4 preview leads

Grok 3: 36.2 (#122), Hy4 preview: 54.5 (#37)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Hy4 preview
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202555.6%—
ProofBench—75%
Omni-MATH46.4%—
LMArena Math1390—
MATH Level 588.7%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)3.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok 3: 46.0 (#76), Hy4 preview: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Hy4 preview
GPQA Diamond75.8%—
MMLU-Pro78.8%—
Confabulations14.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.8%—
GPQA (HELM)65%—
LMArena Expert1420—

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok 3: 52.5 (#81), Hy4 preview: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Hy4 preview
LMArena Non-English1411—
LMArena Chinese1448—
LMArena French1460—
LMArena German1431—
LMArena Japanese1389—
LMArena Korean1374—
LMArena Russian1416—
LMArena Spanish1417—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Grok 3: 75.2 (#69), Hy4 preview: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Hy4 preview
IFEval88.4%—
LMArena Instruction Following1409—

Long Context Not comparable

Grok 3: 38.7 (#187), Hy4 preview: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Hy4 preview
Fiction.LiveBench58.3%—
LMArena Longer Query1439—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Grok 3: 56.0 (#136), Hy4 preview: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Hy4 preview
LMArena Text1426—
LMArena Creative Writing1414—
Short-Story Creative Writing76.4%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1186—
WildBench84.9%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1424—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 3 better than Hy4 preview?

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.6 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 3 or Hy4 preview better for coding?

Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.4 versus 41.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 3 and Hy4 preview share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Hy4 preview has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper