Model comparison

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) vs Qwen-7B

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) has enough public results to be ranked (#54); Qwen-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) xAI

48.6

Rank #54 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
  • Qwen-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) and Qwen-7B specifications
Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)Qwen-7B
ProviderxAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index48.6—
Released2026-02-172023-09-28
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output30K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$2.50—
Results tracked468

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 42.1 (#112), Qwen-7B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)Qwen-7B
LMArena WebDev1375—
WeirdML52.3%—
LMArena Coding1459—
ALE-Bench1,150—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 34.4 (#46), Qwen-7B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)Qwen-7B
Terminal-Bench57.3%—
τ²-bench Banking18%—
LMArena Search1189—
Vending-Bench 24,663—

Reasoning Not comparable

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 52.3 (#32), Qwen-7B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)Qwen-7B
Epoch Capabilities Index151.98106.83
ARC-AGI-265.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark75%—
NYT Connections (extended)85.4%—
ARC-AGI-189.5%—
Chess Puzzles24%—
Thematic Generalization63.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1451—
DTBench90.1%—
LMCA38.7%—
BIG-Bench Hard—45%
ForecastBench61.4—
LAMBADA—67.9%
PIQA—77.9%

Math Not comparable

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 48.2 (#65), Qwen-7B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)Qwen-7B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)44.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 417.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202592.2%—
ProofBench14%—
LMArena Math1455—
GSM8K—51.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 52.8 (#60), Qwen-7B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)Qwen-7B
GPQA Diamond89.3%—
SimpleQA Verified30.2%—
LMArena Expert1439—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—75.3%
BoolQ—76.4%
MMLU—45%

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 33.3 (#98), Qwen-7B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)Qwen-7B
LMArena Vision1263—
Blueprint-Bench 20%—
LMArena Document1416—

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 54.5 (#40), Qwen-7B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)Qwen-7B
LMArena Non-English1441—
LMArena Chinese1481—
LMArena French1476—
LMArena German1465—
LMArena Japanese1449—
LMArena Korean1417—
LMArena Russian1458—
LMArena Spanish1443—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 74.8 (#83), Qwen-7B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)Qwen-7B
LMArena Instruction Following1420—

Long Context Not comparable

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 45.5 (#34), Qwen-7B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)Qwen-7B
CL-bench22.2%—
CL-bench Life11.9%—
LMArena Longer Query1437—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): 65.7 (#44), Qwen-7B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)Qwen-7B
LMArena Text1451—
LMArena Creative Writing1438—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1574—
LMArena Multi-Turn1456—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) better than Qwen-7B?

Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) has enough public results to be ranked (#54); Qwen-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) and Qwen-7B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) has 46 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-7B has 8.

Related comparisons

Go deeper