Model comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen-7B
MiMo-V2.6-Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#55); Qwen-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 48.5 | — |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | 2023-09-28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 8 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1637 | — |
| SciCode | 51.3% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1504 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 12% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1482 | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 45% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 106.83 |
| LAMBADA | — | 67.9% |
| PIQA | — | 77.9% |
Math Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 63% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1468 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 51.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1501 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 75.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 76.4% |
| MMLU | — | 45% |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1259 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1511 | — |
| LMArena French | 1475 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1409 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1463 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1463 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1455 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1400 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1451 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than Qwen-7B?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#55); Qwen-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Qwen-7B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-7B has 8.