Model comparison

Grok 4.3 vs Step 3

Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 40.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.3 xAI

43.8

Rank #86 Confirmed

Step 3 StepFun

40.5

Rank #149 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.3 scores higher in 8 categories and Step 3 in 1 category; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4.3 leads 52.5 to 36.8.
  • Step 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4.3 and Step 3 specifications
Grok 4.3Step 3
ProviderxAIStepFun
Noometry Index43.840.5
Released2026-04-17—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output30K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$2.50—
Results tracked4017

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 41.6 (#121), Step 3: 40.1 (#147)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Step 3
LMArena Coding14151367
LMArena WebDev1357—
SciCode47.3%—
WeirdML49.9%—
ALE-Bench944.17—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 27.7 (#99), Step 3: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Step 3
GDP.pdf8%—
LMArena Search1165—
Vending-Bench 235.26—

Reasoning Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 35.9 (#68), Step 3: 28.4 (#105)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Step 3
LMArena Hard Prompts13961355
Kagi LLM Benchmark—62.3%
NYT Connections (extended)55.2%—
CritPt8%—
Chess Puzzles25%—
DTBench90.7%—
LMCA38.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index149.16—
ForecastBench60.3—

Math Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 46.0 (#74), Step 3: 37.6 (#148)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Step 3
LMArena Math13881366
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)42.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 414.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202593.3%—
ProofBench11%—

Knowledge Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 52.5 (#62), Step 3: 36.8 (#164)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Step 3
LMArena Expert13851333
GPQA Diamond88.8%—
SimpleQA Verified33.2%—

Multimodal Step 3 leads

Grok 4.3: 31.6 (#104), Step 3: 35.5 (#86)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Step 3
LMArena Vision12291177
Blueprint-Bench 20%—

Multilingual Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 50.5 (#120), Step 3: 46.3 (#159)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Step 3
LMArena Non-English13851327
LMArena Chinese14221397
LMArena German13951371
LMArena Korean13561269
LMArena Russian13991331
LMArena Spanish13981371
LMArena French1412—
LMArena Japanese1379—

Instruction Following Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 72.1 (#140), Step 3: 70.4 (#164)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Step 3
LMArena Instruction Following13661332

Long Context Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 42.5 (#123), Step 3: 40.3 (#157)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Step 3
LMArena Longer Query13931326

Writing & Preference Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 58.5 (#118), Step 3: 54.3 (#151)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Step 3
LMArena Text13971350
LMArena Creative Writing13801321
LMArena Multi-Turn14061341
EQ-Bench 41075—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.3 better than Step 3?

Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 40.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.3 or Step 3 better for coding?

Grok 4.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.6 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.3 and Step 3 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper