Model comparison

MiniMax-M3 vs Step 3

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 40.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M3 MiniMax

43.8

Rank #85 Confirmed

Step 3 StepFun

40.5

Rank #149 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M3 scores higher in 9 categories and Step 3 in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M3 leads 58.4 to 36.8.

Side by side

MiniMax-M3 and Step 3 specifications
MiniMax-M3Step 3
ProviderMiniMaxStepFun
Noometry Index43.840.5
Released2026-06-01—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M—
Max output512K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$1.20—
Results tracked4117

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 41.8 (#118), Step 3: 40.1 (#147)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Step 3
LMArena Coding14691367
FrontierCode14.7%—
LMArena WebDev1482—
SciCode47.1%—
ALE-Bench640.02—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiniMax-M3: 22.6 (#130), Step 3: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Step 3
APEX-Agents37.7%—
OSWorld 2.04.6%—
GBAEval0.9%—
Vending-Bench 22,158—

Reasoning MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 30.1 (#87), Step 3: 28.4 (#105)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Step 3
LMArena Hard Prompts14471355
SimpleBench45.8%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—62.3%
NYT Connections (extended)65.1%—
CritPt3.7%—
Chess Puzzles14%—
Mystery Game Puzzles8%—
DTBench78.9%—
LMCA33.7%—
Surface Evolver Bench55%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.95—
ForecastBench61.4—

Math MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 40.0 (#95), Step 3: 37.6 (#148)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Step 3
LMArena Math14291366
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202571.1%—
ProofBench18%—

Knowledge MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 58.4 (#35), Step 3: 36.8 (#164)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Step 3
LMArena Expert14611333
GPQA Diamond90.9%—

Multimodal MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 40.2 (#51), Step 3: 35.5 (#86)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Step 3
LMArena Vision12531177
LMArena Document1435—

Multilingual MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 53.0 (#75), Step 3: 46.3 (#159)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Step 3
LMArena Non-English14201327
LMArena Chinese14631397
LMArena German14261371
LMArena Korean13721269
LMArena Russian14281331
LMArena Spanish14321371
LMArena French1447—
LMArena Japanese1381—

Instruction Following MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 75.5 (#62), Step 3: 70.4 (#164)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Step 3
LMArena Instruction Following14331332

Long Context MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 44.2 (#72), Step 3: 40.3 (#157)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Step 3
LMArena Longer Query14451326

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 62.1 (#83), Step 3: 54.3 (#151)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Step 3
LMArena Text14331350
LMArena Creative Writing14041321
LMArena Multi-Turn14421341
EQ-Bench 41150—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-M3 better than Step 3?

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 40.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiniMax-M3 or Step 3 better for coding?

MiniMax-M3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M3 and Step 3 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M3 has 41 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper