Noometry

Model comparison

Grok 4.6 vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10

Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.6 xAI

56.9

Rank #21 Confirmed

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.6

Rank #184 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.6 scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.6 leads 61.4 to 25.5.

Side by side

Grok 4.6Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
ProviderxAITencent
Noometry Index56.938.6
Released2026-08-12—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window500K—
Max output500K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$6—
Results tracked4912

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 58.5 (#16), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Coding14651307
DeepSWE67.5%—
FrontierCode48%—
CursorBench41.4%—
LMArena WebDev1617—
FrontierSWE25.3%—
SciCode56.5%—
WeirdML67.3%—
ALE-Bench1,508—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 39.4 (#27), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
APEX-Agents65.3%—
GDP.pdf17.2%—
Vending-Bench 29,047—

Reasoning Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 61.4 (#20), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Hard Prompts14471286
ARC-AGI-267.1%—
SimpleBench75.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)80%—
ARC-AGI-187.5%—
CritPt19.7%—
Chess Puzzles40%—
EBR-Bench30.5%—
Mystery Game Puzzles34%—
DTBench97.3%—
LMCA48.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.44—

Math Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 67.0 (#24), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Math14231281
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)66%—
FrontierMath Tier 431.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202599.2%—
ProofBench51%—

Knowledge Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 63.3 (#20), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Expert14671276
GPQA Diamond94%—
SimpleQA Verified49.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 43.6 (#23), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Vision1263—
Blueprint-Bench 233.2%—
Furniture Assembly40%—
LMArena Document1452—

Multilingual Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 53.0 (#74), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Non-English14201265
LMArena Chinese14801346
LMArena Russian14221266
LMArena French1461—
LMArena German1431—
LMArena Japanese1376—
LMArena Korean1397—
LMArena Spanish1404—

Instruction Following Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 75.4 (#63), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Instruction Following14311277

Long Context Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 44.5 (#66), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Longer Query14541341

Writing & Preference Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 62.3 (#80), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Text14281288
LMArena Creative Writing14281264
LMArena Multi-Turn14251284

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.6 better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?

Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.6 or Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better for coding?

Grok 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.5 versus 38.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.6 and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.6 has 49 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper