Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.6

Rank #184 Confirmed

Qwen3.8 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

56.8

Rank #22 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 Max in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.8 Max leads 73.2 to 35.8.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.8 Max
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index38.656.8
Released—2026-08-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1239

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181), Qwen3.8 Max: 53.5 (#29)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Coding13071502
DeepSWE—57.5%
LMArena WebDev—1674
FrontierSWE—17.8%
SciCode—53.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.4 (#14)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.8 Max
APEX-Agents—63.3%
τ²-bench Banking—55.1%
GDP.pdf—23.2%

Reasoning Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148), Qwen3.8 Max: 54.4 (#26)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts12861496
NYT Connections (extended)—88.3%
CritPt—20%
Chess Puzzles—40%
Mystery Game Puzzles—38%
DTBench—92%
LMCA—46.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.41

Math Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178), Qwen3.8 Max: 73.2 (#20)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Math12811499
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—100%
ProofBench—58%

Knowledge Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188), Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#27)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Expert12761507
GPQA Diamond—92.7%
SimpleQA Verified—47.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 37.2 (#75)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Vision—1314
Furniture Assembly—20%

Multilingual Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200), Qwen3.8 Max: 56.7 (#18)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Non-English12651472
LMArena Chinese13461538
LMArena Russian12661481
LMArena French—1503
LMArena German—1483
LMArena Japanese—1467
LMArena Korean—1461
LMArena Spanish—1492

Instruction Following Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197), Qwen3.8 Max: 77.6 (#17)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Instruction Following12771479

Long Context Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149), Qwen3.8 Max: 45.6 (#31)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Longer Query13411489

Writing & Preference Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197), Qwen3.8 Max: 67.1 (#30)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Text12881483
LMArena Creative Writing12641479
LMArena Multi-Turn12841489

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.8 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.5 versus 38.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Qwen3.8 Max share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Max has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper