Noometry

Model comparison

Grok 4.6 vs Hunyuan Turbo 0110

Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.6 xAI

56.9

Rank #21 Confirmed

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 Tencent

39.6

Rank #163 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.6 scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.6 leads 61.4 to 26.1.

Side by side

Grok 4.6Hunyuan Turbo 0110
ProviderxAITencent
Noometry Index56.939.6
Released2026-08-12—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window500K—
Max output500K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$6—
Results tracked4911

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 58.5 (#16), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Coding14651319
DeepSWE67.5%—
FrontierCode48%—
CursorBench41.4%—
LMArena WebDev1617—
FrontierSWE25.3%—
SciCode56.5%—
WeirdML67.3%—
ALE-Bench1,508—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 39.4 (#27), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Turbo 0110
APEX-Agents65.3%—
GDP.pdf17.2%—
Vending-Bench 29,047—

Reasoning Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 61.4 (#20), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Hard Prompts14471308
ARC-AGI-267.1%—
SimpleBench75.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)80%—
ARC-AGI-187.5%—
CritPt19.7%—
Chess Puzzles40%—
EBR-Bench30.5%—
Mystery Game Puzzles34%—
DTBench97.3%—
LMCA48.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.44—

Math Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 67.0 (#24), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Math14231273
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)66%—
FrontierMath Tier 431.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202599.2%—
ProofBench51%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 63.3 (#20), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Turbo 0110
GPQA Diamond94%—
SimpleQA Verified49.3%—
LMArena Expert1467—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 43.6 (#23), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Vision1263—
Blueprint-Bench 233.2%—
Furniture Assembly40%—
LMArena Document1452—

Multilingual Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 53.0 (#74), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Non-English14201285
LMArena Chinese14801358
LMArena Russian14221305
LMArena French1461—
LMArena German1431—
LMArena Japanese1376—
LMArena Korean1397—
LMArena Spanish1404—

Instruction Following Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 75.4 (#63), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Instruction Following14311278

Long Context Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 44.5 (#66), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Longer Query14541309

Writing & Preference Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 62.3 (#80), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183)

BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Text14281311
LMArena Creative Writing14281269
LMArena Multi-Turn14251303

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.6 better than Hunyuan Turbo 0110?

Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.6 or Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better for coding?

Grok 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.5 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.6 and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.6 has 49 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper