Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 vs Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 Tencent

39.6

Rank #163 Confirmed

Qwen3.8 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

56.8

Rank #22 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 Max in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.8 Max leads 73.2 to 35.6.

Side by side

Hunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen3.8 Max
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.656.8
Released—2026-08-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1139

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171), Qwen3.8 Max: 53.5 (#29)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Coding13191502
DeepSWE—57.5%
LMArena WebDev—1674
FrontierSWE—17.8%
SciCode—53.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.4 (#14)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen3.8 Max
APEX-Agents—63.3%
τ²-bench Banking—55.1%
GDP.pdf—23.2%

Reasoning Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137), Qwen3.8 Max: 54.4 (#26)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts13081496
NYT Connections (extended)—88.3%
CritPt—20%
Chess Puzzles—40%
Mystery Game Puzzles—38%
DTBench—92%
LMCA—46.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.41

Math Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180), Qwen3.8 Max: 73.2 (#20)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Math12731499
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—100%
ProofBench—58%

Knowledge Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#27)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen3.8 Max
GPQA Diamond—92.7%
SimpleQA Verified—47.3%
LMArena Expert—1507

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 37.2 (#75)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Vision—1314
Furniture Assembly—20%

Multilingual Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184), Qwen3.8 Max: 56.7 (#18)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Non-English12851472
LMArena Chinese13581538
LMArena Russian13051481
LMArena French—1503
LMArena German—1483
LMArena Japanese—1467
LMArena Korean—1461
LMArena Spanish—1492

Instruction Following Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195), Qwen3.8 Max: 77.6 (#17)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Instruction Following12781479

Long Context Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168), Qwen3.8 Max: 45.6 (#31)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Longer Query13091489

Writing & Preference Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183), Qwen3.8 Max: 67.1 (#30)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Text13111483
LMArena Creative Writing12691479
LMArena Multi-Turn13031489

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better than Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.8 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.5 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Qwen3.8 Max share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Max has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper