Model comparison

Grok 4.6 vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5

Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.6 xAI

56.9

Rank #21 Confirmed

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 Tencent

43.1

Rank #98 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.6 scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.6 leads 61.4 to 28.9.

Side by side

Grok 4.6 and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 specifications
Grok 4.6Hunyuan Vision 1.5
ProviderxAITencent
Noometry Index56.943.1
Released2026-08-12—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window500K—
Max output500K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$6—
Results tracked499

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 58.5 (#16), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Coding14651418
DeepSWE67.5%—
FrontierCode48%—
CursorBench41.4%—
LMArena WebDev1617—
FrontierSWE25.3%—
SciCode56.5%—
WeirdML67.3%—
ALE-Bench1,508—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 39.4 (#27), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Vision 1.5
APEX-Agents65.3%—
GDP.pdf17.2%—
Vending-Bench 29,047—

Reasoning Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 61.4 (#20), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Hard Prompts14471416
ARC-AGI-267.1%—
SimpleBench75.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)80%—
ARC-AGI-187.5%—
CritPt19.7%—
Chess Puzzles40%—
EBR-Bench30.5%—
Mystery Game Puzzles34%—
DTBench97.3%—
LMCA48.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.44—

Math Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 67.0 (#24), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Vision 1.5
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)66%—
FrontierMath Tier 431.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202599.2%—
ProofBench51%—
LMArena Math1423—

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 63.3 (#20), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Vision 1.5
GPQA Diamond94%—
SimpleQA Verified49.3%—
LMArena Expert1467—

Multimodal Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 43.6 (#23), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Vision12631180
Blueprint-Bench 233.2%—
Furniture Assembly40%—
LMArena Document1452—

Multilingual Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 53.0 (#74), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Non-English14201382
LMArena Chinese1480—
LMArena French1461—
LMArena German1431—
LMArena Japanese1376—
LMArena Korean1397—
LMArena Russian1422—
LMArena Spanish1404—

Instruction Following Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 75.4 (#63), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Instruction Following14311397

Long Context Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 44.5 (#66), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Longer Query14541404

Writing & Preference Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 62.3 (#80), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Vision 1.5
LMArena Text14281405
LMArena Creative Writing14281388
LMArena Multi-Turn14251422

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.6 better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?

Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.6 or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?

Grok 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.5 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.6 and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.6 has 49 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper