Model comparison

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 Tencent

43.1

Rank #98 Confirmed

Qwen3.8 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

56.8

Rank #22 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 Max in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.8 Max leads 54.4 to 28.9.

Side by side

Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Qwen3.8 Max specifications
Hunyuan Vision 1.5Qwen3.8 Max
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index43.156.8
Released—2026-08-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked939

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119), Qwen3.8 Max: 53.5 (#29)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Coding14181502
DeepSWE—57.5%
LMArena WebDev—1674
FrontierSWE—17.8%
SciCode—53.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.4 (#14)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Qwen3.8 Max
APEX-Agents—63.3%
τ²-bench Banking—55.1%
GDP.pdf—23.2%

Reasoning Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97), Qwen3.8 Max: 54.4 (#26)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts14161496
NYT Connections (extended)—88.3%
CritPt—20%
Chess Puzzles—40%
Mystery Game Puzzles—38%
DTBench—92%
LMCA—46.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.41

Math Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 73.2 (#20)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Qwen3.8 Max
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—100%
ProofBench—58%
LMArena Math—1499

Knowledge Not comparable

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#27)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Qwen3.8 Max
GPQA Diamond—92.7%
SimpleQA Verified—47.3%
LMArena Expert—1507

Multimodal Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84), Qwen3.8 Max: 37.2 (#75)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Vision11801314
Furniture Assembly—20%

Multilingual Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125), Qwen3.8 Max: 56.7 (#18)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Non-English13821472
LMArena Chinese—1538
LMArena French—1503
LMArena German—1483
LMArena Japanese—1467
LMArena Korean—1461
LMArena Russian—1481
LMArena Spanish—1492

Instruction Following Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117), Qwen3.8 Max: 77.6 (#17)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Instruction Following13971479

Long Context Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115), Qwen3.8 Max: 45.6 (#31)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Longer Query14041489

Writing & Preference Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100), Qwen3.8 Max: 67.1 (#30)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Vision 1.5Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Text14051483
LMArena Creative Writing13881479
LMArena Multi-Turn14221489

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.8 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.5 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Qwen3.8 Max share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Max has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper