Noometry

Model comparison

Grok 4.7 vs Longcat Flash Chat

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.7 xAI

53.1

Rank #37 Confirmed

Longcat Flash Chat Meituan

42.1

Rank #120 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 5 categories and Longcat Flash Chat in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.7 leads 49.1 to 19.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 76.8% for Grok 4.7 and 17.7% for Longcat Flash Chat.
  • Longcat Flash Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4.7Longcat Flash Chat
ProviderxAIMeituan
Noometry Index53.142.1
Released2026-09-21—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window500K—
Max output500K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$6—
Results tracked3919

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Coding14271471
FrontierCode47.6%—
CursorBench46.3%—
LMArena WebDev1639—
FrontierSWE29.5%—
SciCode57.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37), Longcat Flash Chat: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Longcat Flash Chat
APEX-Agents54.6%—
GDP.pdf22.8%—
Vending-Bench 210,537—

Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40), Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Longcat Flash Chat
NYT Connections (extended)76.8%17.7%
LMArena Hard Prompts14131440
Kagi LLM Benchmark—43.9%
CritPt18%—
Chess Puzzles38%—
Mystery Game Puzzles29%—
DTBench96%—
LMCA49.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index153.53—

Math Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39), Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Math14071442
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)53%—
FrontierMath Tier 417.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.1%—
ProofBench34%—

Knowledge Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22), Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Expert14221454
GPQA Diamond92.7%—
SimpleQA Verified56%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87), Longcat Flash Chat: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Vision1228—
Blueprint-Bench 232.5%—
Furniture Assembly20.8%—

Multilingual Longcat Flash Chat leads

Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116), Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Non-English13891404
LMArena Chinese14551465
LMArena French14551456
LMArena Russian13971395
LMArena Spanish14001445
LMArena German—1408
LMArena Japanese—1373
LMArena Korean—1371

Instruction Following Too close to call

Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105), Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Instruction Following14041411

Long Context Too close to call

Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Longer Query14131425

Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24), Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91)

BenchmarkGrok 4.7Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Text13991427
LMArena Creative Writing13911388
LMArena Multi-Turn13931418
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2007—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.7 better than Longcat Flash Chat?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.7 or Longcat Flash Chat better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 43.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Longcat Flash Chat share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 39 scored results on Noometry and Longcat Flash Chat has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper