Model comparison

Grok 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 44.4 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs 17× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.7 xAI

46.6

Rank #56 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

44.4

Rank #74 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 4 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 5 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multimodal, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 40.2 to 28.8.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Grok 4.7.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 500K.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4.7 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash specifications
Grok 4.7MiMo-V2.6-Flash
ProviderxAIXiaomi
Noometry Index46.644.4
Released2026-09-212026-09-22
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window500K1.05M
Max output500K131K
Input $ / M tokens$2$0.14
Output $ / M tokens$6$0.28
Results tracked2113

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.3 (#68)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Coding14231516
CursorBench46.3%—
LMArena WebDev1636—
FrontierSWE29.5%—
SciCode57.4%—

Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 29.6 (#82)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts14091481
NYT Connections (extended)76.8%—
CritPt17.7%—

Math Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 37.4 (#97)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Math13931477
ProofBench34%—

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.0 (#91)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Expert14131516

Multimodal MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.2 (#39)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision—1266
Furniture Assembly20.8%—

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.6 (#41)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Non-English13921439
LMArena Chinese14761501
LMArena Russian13961424

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 77.0 (#33)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following14061463

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#52)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Longer Query14161465

Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.9 (#61)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text13971459
LMArena Creative Writing13911408
LMArena Multi-Turn13891460
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2007—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.7 better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.6 to 44.4 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs 17× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Grok 4.7's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Grok 4.7 lists at $2 and $6.

Is Grok 4.7 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.0 versus 44.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 500K.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper