Model comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 48.5 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs 3.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 9 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 43.1 to 36.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 12% for MiMo-V2.6-Flash and 26.6% for MiMo-V2.6-Pro.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 48.5 | 50.3 |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Max output | 131K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1637 | 1629 |
| SciCode | 51.3% | 60.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1504 | 1534 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,158 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 59.5% |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 12% | 26.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1482 | 1512 |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 63% | 70% |
| LMArena Math | 1468 | 1494 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1501 | 1543 |
Multimodal Too close to call
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1259 | 1264 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1434 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1511 | 1529 |
| LMArena Russian | 1409 | 1480 |
| LMArena French | 1475 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1456 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1463 | 1493 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1463 | 1501 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1455 | 1492 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1400 | 1468 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1451 | 1464 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 48.5 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs 3.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.
Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 53.4 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 1.05M tokens.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.