Model comparison

Grok 4.7 vs Reka Flash 3

Grok 4.7 has enough public results to be ranked (#56); Reka Flash 3 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.7 xAI

46.6

Rank #56 Confirmed

Reka Flash 3 Reka

36.4

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 1 category and Reka Flash 3 in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.7 leads 70.1 to 43.8.
  • Reka Flash 3 is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Grok 4.7.
  • Grok 4.7 accepts more context: 500K tokens versus 66K.
  • Reka Flash 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 4.7 and Reka Flash 3 specifications
Grok 4.7Reka Flash 3
ProviderxAIReka
Noometry Index46.636.4
Released2026-09-212025-03-10
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window500K66K
Max output500K59K
Input $ / M tokens$2$0.10
Output $ / M tokens$6$0.20
Results tracked212

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 55.0 (#23), Reka Flash 3: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Reka Flash 3
CursorBench46.3%—
LMArena WebDev1636—
FrontierSWE29.5%—
SciCode57.4%—
LMArena Coding1423—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.7: —, Reka Flash 3: 30.1

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Reka Flash 3
BALROG—29.2%

Reasoning Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 40.1 (#49), Reka Flash 3: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Reka Flash 3
NYT Connections (extended)76.8%—
CritPt17.7%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1409—

Math Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 41.1 (#73), Reka Flash 3: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Reka Flash 3
ProofBench34%—
LMArena Math1393—

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 38.7 (#130), Reka Flash 3: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Reka Flash 3
LMArena Expert1413—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 28.8 (#107), Reka Flash 3: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Reka Flash 3
Furniture Assembly20.8%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 51.2 (#108), Reka Flash 3: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Reka Flash 3
LMArena Non-English1392—
LMArena Chinese1476—
LMArena Russian1396—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 74.3 (#98), Reka Flash 3: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Reka Flash 3
LMArena Instruction Following1406—

Long Context Not comparable

Grok 4.7: 43.2 (#97), Reka Flash 3: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Reka Flash 3
LMArena Longer Query1416—

Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads

Grok 4.7: 70.1 (#23), Reka Flash 3: 43.8

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.7Reka Flash 3
EQ-Bench Creative Writing20071228
LMArena Text1397—
LMArena Creative Writing1391—
LMArena Multi-Turn1389—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.7 better than Reka Flash 3?

Grok 4.7 has enough public results to be ranked (#56); Reka Flash 3 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or Reka Flash 3?

Reka Flash 3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Grok 4.7 lists at $2 and $6.

Which has the bigger context window?

Grok 4.7 does, with 500K tokens against 66K.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Reka Flash 3 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Reka Flash 3 has 2.

Related comparisons

Go deeper