Model comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Reka Flash 3
MiMo-V2.6-Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#55); Reka Flash 3 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 66.9 to 43.8.
- Reka Flash 3 is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 66K.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Reka Flash 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Reka |
| Noometry Index | 46.7 | 36.4 |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2025-03-10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 66K |
| Max output | 131K | 59K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 14 | 2 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27), Reka Flash 3: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Reka Flash 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1618 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1538 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: —, Reka Flash 3: 30.1
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Reka Flash 3 |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 29.2% |
Reasoning Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76), Reka Flash 3: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Reka Flash 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1511 | — |
Math Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91), Reka Flash 3: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Reka Flash 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1497 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85), Reka Flash 3: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Reka Flash 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1548 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40), Reka Flash 3: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Reka Flash 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1265 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15), Reka Flash 3: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Reka Flash 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1474 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1532 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1481 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10), Reka Flash 3: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Reka Flash 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1490 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26), Reka Flash 3: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Reka Flash 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1500 | — |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32), Reka Flash 3: 43.8
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Reka Flash 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1491 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1465 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1228 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1463 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than Reka Flash 3?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#55); Reka Flash 3 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Reka Flash 3?
Reka Flash 3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 66K.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Reka Flash 3 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14 scored results on Noometry and Reka Flash 3 has 2.