Model comparison
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs o3-mini
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and o3-mini score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.2 vs 36.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 3 categories and o3-mini in 5 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where o3-mini leads 75.3 to 65.8.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | o3-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 37.2 | 36.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-12-20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $4.40 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 51 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o3-mini leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 36.5 (#192), o3-mini: 41.4 (#116)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1378 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 60.4% |
| SciCode | — | 39.8% |
| GSO | — | 1.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 43.7% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 82.7% |
| CadEval | — | 54% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —, o3-mini: 29.3 (#79)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 22.5% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 23.9 (#157), o3-mini: 16.3 (#295)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | 1366 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 3% |
| SimpleBench | — | 22.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 34.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 17% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 89.6% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 7% |
| DTBench | — | 68.8% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 70.6% |
| LMCA | — | 19% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 140.35 |
| ForecastBench | — | 59.6 |
| LiveBench | — | 75.9% |
Math Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.0 (#179), o3-mini: 27.6 (#236)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1274 | 1396 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 0% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 76.9% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 96.5% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 12.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 4.2% |
Knowledge o3-mini leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.6 (#192), o3-mini: 38.3 (#135)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1364 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 77% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 15.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 17.9% |
Multilingual o3-mini leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.9 (#198), o3-mini: 45.9 (#159)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | 1319 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | 1379 |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | 1304 |
| LMArena French | — | 1333 |
| LMArena German | — | 1303 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1286 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1314 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1321 |
Instruction Following o3-mini leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.8 (#214), o3-mini: 75.3 (#67)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1338 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 84.4% |
Long Context Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#168), o3-mini: 33.8 (#251)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | 1343 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 50% |
Writing & Preference o3-mini leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.4 (#209), o3-mini: 50.4 (#177)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | 1337 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1286 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1320 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 61.7% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 50.7% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than o3-mini?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and o3-mini score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.2 vs 36.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or o3-mini better for coding?
o3-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.4 versus 36.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and o3-mini share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and o3-mini has 51.