Model comparison

Hy4 preview vs Muse Glimmer

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Hy4 preview Tencent

45.3

Rank #73 Reported

Muse Glimmer Meta

41.7

Rank #131 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Hy4 preview scores higher in 3 categories and Muse Glimmer in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Hy4 preview leads 55.7 to 38.8.

Side by side

Hy4 preview and Muse Glimmer specifications
Hy4 previewMuse Glimmer
ProviderTencentMeta
Noometry Index45.341.7
Released2026-08-282026-08-10
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output64K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.83—
Output $ / M tokens$2.50—
Results tracked315

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy4 preview leads

Hy4 preview: 51.6 (#38), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMuse Glimmer
LMArena WebDev16321355
SciCode—44.9%
LMArena Coding—1416

Reasoning Hy4 preview leads

Hy4 preview: 31.9 (#79), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMuse Glimmer
NYT Connections (extended)68.2%—
CritPt—2.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1396

Math Hy4 preview leads

Hy4 preview: 55.7 (#42), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMuse Glimmer
ProofBench75%—
LMArena Math—1417

Knowledge Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMuse Glimmer
LMArena Expert—1386

Multilingual Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMuse Glimmer
LMArena Non-English—1384
LMArena Chinese—1412
LMArena Russian—1390

Instruction Following Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMuse Glimmer
LMArena Instruction Following—1375

Long Context Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMuse Glimmer
LMArena Longer Query—1382

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Hy4 preview: —, Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHy4 previewMuse Glimmer
LMArena Text—1389
LMArena Creative Writing—1339
LMArena Multi-Turn—1399

Frequently asked questions

Is Hy4 preview better than Muse Glimmer?

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hy4 preview or Muse Glimmer better for coding?

Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.6 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hy4 preview and Muse Glimmer share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Hy4 preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper