Model comparison

Inkling-Small vs Kimi K2.5 Instant

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Inkling-Small Thinking Machines Lab

46.5

Rank #57 Confirmed

Kimi K2.5 Instant Moonshot AI

42.9

Rank #92 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling-Small scores higher in 4 categories and Kimi K2.5 Instant in 5 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Inkling-Small leads 39.0 to 28.5.

Side by side

Inkling-Small and Kimi K2.5 Instant specifications
Inkling-SmallKimi K2.5 Instant
ProviderThinking Machines LabMoonshot AI
Noometry Index46.542.9
Released2026-07-15—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window524K—
Max output1.05M—
Input $ / M tokens$0.45—
Output $ / M tokens$1.20—
Results tracked3318

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 43.3 (#80), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.3 (#95)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena WebDev14081404
LMArena Coding14511483
SciCode48.7%—

Reasoning Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 39.0 (#53), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 28.5 (#88)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Hard Prompts14241443
ARC-AGI-240.1%—
ARC-AGI-184%—
CritPt8.3%—
Chess Puzzles18%—
Mystery Game Puzzles6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index150.13—

Math Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 44.9 (#65), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 36.6 (#105)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Math14531443
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)46.3%—
FrontierMath Tier 417.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202590%—
ProofBench6%—

Knowledge Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 48.3 (#71), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.5 (#121)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Expert14421438
GPQA Diamond88.5%—
SimpleQA Verified19.1%—

Multimodal Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Inkling-Small: 38.4 (#59), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.5 (#47)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Vision12351254

Multilingual Too close to call

Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#102), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.2 (#89)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Non-English14001406
LMArena Chinese14581450
LMArena French14381403
LMArena German14121413
LMArena Korean13551378
LMArena Russian13921404
LMArena Spanish14261448
LMArena Japanese1399—

Instruction Following Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Inkling-Small: 73.9 (#112), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.5 (#61)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Instruction Following13971430

Long Context Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#113), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.8 (#82)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Longer Query14011435

Writing & Preference Kimi K2.5 Instant leads

Inkling-Small: 59.8 (#102), Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.8 (#91)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallKimi K2.5 Instant
LMArena Text14131420
LMArena Creative Writing13301379
LMArena Multi-Turn14201427
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1491—

Frequently asked questions

Is Inkling-Small better than Kimi K2.5 Instant?

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 42.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Inkling-Small or Kimi K2.5 Instant better for coding?

Inkling-Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 42.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Inkling-Small and Kimi K2.5 Instant share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling-Small has 33 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper