Model comparison

Jamba Large vs Muse Spark 1.1

Muse Spark 1.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#51); Jamba Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Jamba Large AI21 Labs

33.1

Unranked Sparse

Muse Spark 1.1 Meta

49.9

Rank #51 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 47.1 to 18.0.
  • Muse Spark 1.1 is cheaper at $1.25 / $4.25 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $8 for Jamba Large.
  • Muse Spark 1.1 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 256K.
  • Jamba Large has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Jamba Large and Muse Spark 1.1 specifications
Jamba LargeMuse Spark 1.1
ProviderAI21 LabsMeta
Noometry Index33.149.9
Released2025-07-012026-04-08
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window256K1.05M
Max output4K131K
Input $ / M tokens$2$1.25
Output $ / M tokens$8$4.25
Results tracked237

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Jamba Large: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 51.3 (#40)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkJamba LargeMuse Spark 1.1
DeepSWE—53.3%
LMArena WebDev—1542
SciCode—58.8%
LMArena Coding—1498

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Jamba Large: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 30.8 (#73)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkJamba LargeMuse Spark 1.1
APEX-Agents—31.8%
τ²-bench Banking—40.5%
GBAEval—7.9%
GDP.pdf—15%
Vending-Bench 2—6,520

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Jamba Large: 18.0, Muse Spark 1.1: 47.1 (#44)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkJamba LargeMuse Spark 1.1
Kagi LLM Benchmark26.1%—
NYT Connections (extended)—84.9%
CritPt—15.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1486
DTBench—94.4%
LMCA—49.9%
Surface Evolver Bench—52.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—154.21

Math Not comparable

Jamba Large: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 45.5 (#76)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkJamba LargeMuse Spark 1.1
ProofBench—39%
LMArena Math—1483

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.1 leads

Jamba Large: 37.7, Muse Spark 1.1: 53.1 (#59)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkJamba LargeMuse Spark 1.1
SimpleQA Verified—57.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.7%—
LMArena Expert—1478

Multimodal Not comparable

Jamba Large: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 42.6 (#29)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkJamba LargeMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Vision—1293
LMArena Document—1465

Multilingual Not comparable

Jamba Large: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 56.7 (#17)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkJamba LargeMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Non-English—1472
LMArena Chinese—1518
LMArena French—1494
LMArena German—1466
LMArena Japanese—1451
LMArena Korean—1458
LMArena Russian—1483
LMArena Spanish—1464

Instruction Following Not comparable

Jamba Large: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 76.5 (#39)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkJamba LargeMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Instruction Following—1457

Long Context Not comparable

Jamba Large: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#58)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkJamba LargeMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Longer Query—1462

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Jamba Large: —, Muse Spark 1.1: 73.4 (#11)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkJamba LargeMuse Spark 1.1
LMArena Text—1479
LMArena Creative Writing—1437
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1927
EQ-Bench 4—1260
LMArena Multi-Turn—1485

Frequently asked questions

Is Jamba Large better than Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#51); Jamba Large does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Jamba Large or Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 is cheaper. It lists at $1.25 per million input tokens and $4.25 per million output tokens; Jamba Large lists at $2 and $8.

Which has the bigger context window?

Muse Spark 1.1 does, with 1.05M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Jamba Large and Muse Spark 1.1 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Jamba Large has 2 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.1 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper