Model comparison

Kimi K2.7 Code vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K2.7 Code Moonshot AI

43.0

Rank #90 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

46.7

Rank #55 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher in 3 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 52.6 to 37.9.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $0.95 / $4 for Kimi K2.7 Code.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.

Side by side

Kimi K2.7 Code and MiMo-V2.6-Pro specifications
Kimi K2.7 CodeMiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProviderMoonshot AIXiaomi
Noometry Index43.046.7
Released2026-06-122026-09-22
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K1.05M
Max output262K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.95$0.43
Output $ / M tokens$4$0.87
Results tracked1914

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.4 (#92), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena WebDev14731618
DeepSWE30.5%—
FrontierCode30.1%—
SciCode47.5%—
WeirdML54.1%—
LMArena Coding—1538
ALE-Bench886.23—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Kimi K2.7 Code: 23.9 (#115), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeMiMo-V2.6-Pro
APEX-Agents37.6%—
GBAEval0.9%—
Vending-Bench 25,083—

Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Kimi K2.7 Code: 38.2 (#56), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeMiMo-V2.6-Pro
SimpleBench57.9%—
CritPt10%—
Chess Puzzles21%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1511
Surface Evolver Bench48.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index150.01—

Math Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.6 (#39), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeMiMo-V2.6-Pro
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)54%—
FrontierMath Tier 412.2%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202595.6%—
LMArena Math—1497

Knowledge Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.6 (#51), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeMiMo-V2.6-Pro
GPQA Diamond87.9%—
SimpleQA Verified36.5%—
LMArena Expert—1548

Multimodal Not comparable

Kimi K2.7 Code: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Vision—1265

Multilingual Not comparable

Kimi K2.7 Code: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Non-English—1474
LMArena Chinese—1532
LMArena Russian—1481

Instruction Following Not comparable

Kimi K2.7 Code: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following—1490

Long Context Not comparable

Kimi K2.7 Code: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Longer Query—1500

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Kimi K2.7 Code: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2.7 CodeMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text—1491
LMArena Creative Writing—1465
LMArena Multi-Turn—1463

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.7 Code or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.7 Code lists at $0.95 and $4.

Is Kimi K2.7 Code or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.2 versus 42.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.7 Code and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Kimi K2.7 Code has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper