Model comparison
MiMo-V2.5 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2.5 costs 3.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5 scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 53.2 to 43.6.
- MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 43.0 | 46.7 |
| Released | 2026-04-22 | 2026-09-22 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1.05M |
| Max output | 131K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 23 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5: 43.6 (#75), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1438 | 1618 |
| LMArena Coding | 1469 | 1538 |
| SciCode | 43.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 513.95 | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5: 27.8 (#98), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1450 | 1511 |
| CritPt | 3.7% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5: 35.4 (#145), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1436 | 1497 |
| ProofBench | 16% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5: 40.2 (#109), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1459 | 1548 |
Multimodal MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5: 39.0 (#53), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1245 | 1265 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5: 52.0 (#96), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1467 | 1532 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 1481 |
| LMArena French | 1447 | — |
| LMArena German | 1421 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1304 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1363 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1412 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5: 75.7 (#55), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1433 | 1490 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5: 44.1 (#69), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1444 | 1500 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5: 61.8 (#82), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1427 | 1491 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1465 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1463 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.5 better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 43.0 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2.5 costs 3.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.
Is MiMo-V2.5 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.2 versus 43.6 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 1.05M tokens.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5 has 23 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14.