Model comparison
Kimi K2.7 Code vs MiMo-V2-Flash
Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 9.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K2.7 Code's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher in 4 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 52.6 to 35.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 47.5% for Kimi K2.7 Code and 25.9% for MiMo-V2-Flash.
- MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.95 / $4 for Kimi K2.7 Code.
Side by side
| Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 43.0 | 40.8 |
| Released | 2026-06-12 | 2025-12-16 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 262K |
| Max output | 262K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.95 | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4 | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.4 (#92), MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.8 (#205)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1473 | 1330 |
| SciCode | 47.5% | 25.9% |
| ALE-Bench | 886.23 | 737.95 |
| DeepSWE | 30.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 30.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 54.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1443 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: 23.9 (#115), MiMo-V2-Flash: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 37.6% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.9% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,083 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 38.2 (#56), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.1 (#155)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 10% | 0% |
| SimpleBench | 57.9% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1420 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 48.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.01 | — |
Math Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.6 (#39), MiMo-V2-Flash: 35.6 (#141)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 54% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 12.2% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1396 |
Knowledge Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.6 (#51), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.1 (#126)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.9% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 36.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1425 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.1 (#109)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1391 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1463 |
| LMArena French | — | 1429 |
| LMArena German | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1324 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1420 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.7 (#115)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1392 |
Long Context Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#106)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1409 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.9 (#101)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1404 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than MiMo-V2-Flash?
Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 40.8 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 9.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Kimi K2.7 Code's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Kimi K2.7 Code or MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Kimi K2.7 Code lists at $0.95 and $4.
Is Kimi K2.7 Code or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?
Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 262K tokens.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.7 Code and MiMo-V2-Flash share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.7 Code has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.