Model comparison
Kimi K2.7 Code vs Muse Glimmer
Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher in 4 categories and Muse Glimmer in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 53.5 to 38.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 10% for Kimi K2.7 Code and 2.6% for Muse Glimmer.
Side by side
| Kimi K2.7 Code | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 43.3 | 41.7 |
| Released | 2026-06-12 | 2026-08-10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 262K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.95 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4 | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1473 | 1355 |
| SciCode | 47.5% | 44.9% |
| DeepSWE | 30.5% | — |
| FrontierCode | 30.1% | — |
| WeirdML | 54.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1416 |
| ALE-Bench | 886.23 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122), Muse Glimmer: —
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 37.6% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.9% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 5,083 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 10% | 2.6% |
| SimpleBench | 57.9% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 21% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1396 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 48.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 149.97 | — |
Math Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 54% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 12.2% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 95.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1417 |
Knowledge Kimi K2.7 Code leads
Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 87.9% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 36.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1386 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1390 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1375 |
Long Context Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1382 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Kimi K2.7 Code: —, Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.7 Code | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1399 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2.7 Code better than Muse Glimmer?
Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2.7 Code or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2.7 Code and Muse Glimmer share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2.7 Code has 19 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.