Model comparison
MiMo-V2.5 vs Muse Glimmer
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5 scores higher in 7 categories and Muse Glimmer in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 61.6 to 57.5.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.5 | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 43.4 | 41.7 |
| Released | 2026-04-22 | 2026-08-10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 23 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1438 | 1355 |
| SciCode | 43.1% | 44.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1469 | 1416 |
| ALE-Bench | 513.95 | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 3.7% | 2.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1450 | 1396 |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1436 | 1417 |
| ProofBench | 16% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | 1386 |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54), Muse Glimmer: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1247 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1468 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 1390 |
| LMArena French | 1447 | — |
| LMArena German | 1421 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1363 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1416 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1434 | 1375 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1445 | 1382 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1428 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1393 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1399 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.5 better than Muse Glimmer?
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2.5 or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5 and Muse Glimmer share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5 has 23 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.