Model comparison
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 45.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 55.5 to 38.4.
Side by side
| Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 45.8 | 50.3 |
| Released | 2025-11-06 | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.4 (#178), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1322 | 1629 |
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1534 |
| SciCode | — | 60.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,158 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 59.5% |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 32.5 (#75), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1428 | 1512 |
| CritPt | — | 26.6% |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 47.4 (#68), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1429 | 1494 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.1% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 70% |
Knowledge Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#69), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | 1543 |
| GPQA Diamond | 84.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1264 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.4 (#109), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | 1529 |
| LMArena Russian | 1391 | 1480 |
| LMArena French | 1425 | — |
| LMArena German | 1390 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1357 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1330 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1406 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.0 (#109), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1403 | 1493 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#102), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | 1501 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.0 (#104), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1415 | 1492 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1374 | 1468 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | 1464 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 45.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 38.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.