Model comparison
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 54.5 to 40.1.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 50.3 | 45.3 |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1534 | 1487 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1629 | — |
| SciCode | 60.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,158 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 59.5% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1512 | 1483 |
| CritPt | 26.6% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1494 | 1474 |
| ProofBench | 70% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1543 | 1489 |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1474 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1529 | 1534 |
| LMArena Russian | 1480 | 1471 |
| LMArena French | — | 1484 |
| LMArena German | — | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1495 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1438 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1470 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1493 | 1467 |
Long Context Too close to call
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1501 | 1476 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1492 | 1470 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1468 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1464 | 1478 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 44.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.