Model comparison
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) vs Qwen3.7 Max
Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.4 to 40.9 on the Noometry Index. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) costs 3.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Max in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 48.4 to 22.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SimpleBench: 26.3% for Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) and 70.4% for Qwen3.7 Max.
- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is cheaper at $0.57 / $2.30 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3.7 Max.
- Qwen3.7 Max accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen3.7 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.9 | 51.4 |
| Released | 2025-07-12 | 2026-05-19 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 262K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.57 | $2.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.30 | $7.50 |
| Results tracked | 42 | 33 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.7 Max leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 43.1 (#83), Qwen3.7 Max: 50.2 (#43)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1399 | 1498 |
| ALE-Bench | 597.5 | 1,189 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 77.3% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 63.4% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 59.1% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1515 |
| SciCode | — | 48.8% |
| GSO | 4.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 42.8% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 32.2 (#59), Qwen3.7 Max: 21.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 35.7% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 59.1% | — |
| GBAEval | — | 0.4% |
| METR Time Horizons | 59.2% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Max leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 22.7 (#173), Qwen3.7 Max: 48.4 (#36)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 26.3% | 70.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1384 | 1483 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.02 | 153.74 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 64.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 85.1% |
| CritPt | — | 13.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 19% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 9.5% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 32% |
| DTBench | — | 92.3% |
| LMCA | — | 44% |
| ForecastBench | 60.2 | — |
Math Qwen3.7 Max leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 40.1 (#81), Qwen3.7 Max: 62.3 (#26)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | 1488 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 64.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 34.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |
| ProofBench | — | 26% |
| Omni-MATH | 65.4% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 21.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Max leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 36.9 (#153), Qwen3.7 Max: 61.7 (#24)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1363 | 1488 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 90.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 55.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | 81.9% | — |
| Confabulations | 20.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 17.9% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 65.3% | — |
Multilingual Qwen3.7 Max leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 49.8 (#125), Qwen3.7 Max: 57.1 (#13)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1372 | 1475 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1416 | 1533 |
| LMArena Russian | 1384 | 1482 |
| LMArena French | 1379 | — |
| LMArena German | 1386 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1349 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1324 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1383 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Max leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 71.3 (#151), Qwen3.7 Max: 76.9 (#34)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1347 | 1460 |
| IFEval | 85% | — |
Long Context Qwen3.7 Max leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 41.2 (#140), Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#34)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1353 | 1484 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 66.7% | — |
| CL-bench | 17.6% | — |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Max leads
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 62.5 (#76), Qwen3.7 Max: 65.2 (#52)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1380 | 1476 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1349 | 1450 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1371 | 1482 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 85.6% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1666 | — |
| WildBench | 86.2% | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1110 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) better than Qwen3.7 Max?
Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.4 to 40.9 on the Noometry Index. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) costs 3.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) or Qwen3.7 Max?
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is cheaper. It lists at $0.57 per million input tokens and $2.30 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Max lists at $2.50 and $7.50.
Is Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?
Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.2 versus 43.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.7 Max does, with 1M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) and Qwen3.7 Max share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has 42 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.