Model comparison

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) vs Step 3

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) and Step 3 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.2 vs 40.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) Moonshot AI

41.2

Rank #140 Confirmed

Step 3 StepFun

40.5

Rank #149 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher in 7 categories and Step 3 in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads 62.3 to 54.3.

Side by side

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) and Step 3 specifications
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)Step 3
ProviderMoonshot AIStepFun
Noometry Index41.240.5
Released2025-07-12—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output262K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.57—
Output $ / M tokens$2.30—
Results tracked4217

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 42.4 (#102), Step 3: 40.1 (#147)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Step 3
LMArena Coding13991367
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)63.4%—
Aider Polyglot59.1%—
GSO4.9%—
WeirdML42.8%—
ALE-Bench597.5—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 32.4 (#64), Step 3: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Step 3
Terminal-Bench35.7%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard59.1%—
METR Time Horizons59.2%—

Reasoning Step 3 leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 23.3 (#179), Step 3: 28.4 (#105)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Step 3
Kagi LLM Benchmark64.4%62.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts13841355
SimpleBench26.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.01—
ForecastBench60.2—

Math Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 42.7 (#83), Step 3: 37.6 (#148)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Step 3
LMArena Math13971366
Omni-MATH65.4%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)21.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge Too close to call

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 37.3 (#157), Step 3: 36.8 (#164)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Step 3
LMArena Expert13651333
MMLU-Pro81.9%—
Confabulations20.4%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate17.9%—
GPQA (HELM)65.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): —, Step 3: 35.5 (#86)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Step 3
LMArena Vision—1177

Multilingual Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 49.6 (#130), Step 3: 46.3 (#159)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Step 3
LMArena Non-English13721327
LMArena Chinese14151397
LMArena German13871371
LMArena Korean13251269
LMArena Russian13851331
LMArena Spanish13861371
LMArena French1379—
LMArena Japanese1349—

Instruction Following Too close to call

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 71.1 (#156), Step 3: 70.4 (#164)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Step 3
LMArena Instruction Following13481332
IFEval85%—

Long Context Too close to call

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 41.2 (#145), Step 3: 40.3 (#157)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Step 3
LMArena Longer Query13531326
Fiction.LiveBench66.7%—
CL-bench17.6%—

Writing & Preference Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 62.3 (#78), Step 3: 54.3 (#151)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K2 (Jul 2025)Step 3
LMArena Text13801350
LMArena Creative Writing13501321
LMArena Multi-Turn13711341
Short-Story Creative Writing85.6%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1666—
WildBench86.2%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) better than Step 3?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) and Step 3 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.2 vs 40.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) or Step 3 better for coding?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) and Step 3 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has 42 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper