Model comparison

Kimi K3 vs Qwen1.5-7B

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K3 Moonshot AI

59.5

Rank #15 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-7B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.4

Rank #273 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K3 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K3 leads 76.6 to 29.6.

Side by side

Kimi K3 and Qwen1.5-7B specifications
Kimi K3Qwen1.5-7B
ProviderMoonshot AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index59.531.4
Released2026-07-162024-02-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output1.05M—
Input $ / M tokens$3—
Output $ / M tokens$15—
Results tracked5313

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 61.0 (#10), Qwen1.5-7B: 32.2 (#276)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Qwen1.5-7B
LMArena Coding15081107
DeepSWE68.5%—
FrontierCode44.2%—
LMArena WebDev1654—
FrontierSWE25.9%—
SciCode59.5%—
WeirdML82.6%—
ALE-Bench1,524—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Kimi K3: 41.8 (#20), Qwen1.5-7B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Qwen1.5-7B
APEX-Agents50.6%—
τ²-bench Banking37.1%—
PostTrainBench32%—
GBAEval48.3%—
GDP.pdf19%—
Vending-Bench 25,165—

Reasoning Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 63.0 (#17), Qwen1.5-7B: 20.4 (#240)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Qwen1.5-7B
LMArena Hard Prompts14961065
ARC-AGI-260.4%—
SimpleBench60.7%—
NYT Connections (extended)93.6%—
ARC-AGI-194.5%—
CritPt23.4%—
Chess Puzzles39%—
Mystery Game Puzzles26%—
DTBench91.2%—
LMCA52.7%—
Surface Evolver Bench95%—
Epoch Capabilities Index157.45—
ForecastBench61.1—

Math Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 74.2 (#16), Qwen1.5-7B: 31.4 (#224)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Qwen1.5-7B
LMArena Math14911080
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)72.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 439%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions87.8%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%—
ProofBench87%—

Knowledge Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 63.2 (#21), Qwen1.5-7B: 28.7 (#243)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Qwen1.5-7B
LMArena Expert15211055
GPQA Diamond93.1%—
SimpleQA Verified50.6%—
MMLU—62.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

Kimi K3: 37.8 (#70), Qwen1.5-7B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Qwen1.5-7B
Blueprint-Bench 229.5%—
Furniture Assembly34.2%—

Multilingual Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 56.3 (#21), Qwen1.5-7B: 28.5 (#271)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Qwen1.5-7B
LMArena Non-English14661058
LMArena Chinese15291141
LMArena Russian14821006
LMArena French1491—
LMArena German1488—
LMArena Japanese1487—
LMArena Korean1458—
LMArena Spanish1472—

Instruction Following Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 77.7 (#14), Qwen1.5-7B: 54.1 (#281)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Qwen1.5-7B
LMArena Instruction Following14831058

Long Context Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 45.8 (#29), Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#266)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Qwen1.5-7B
LMArena Longer Query14941090

Writing & Preference Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 76.6 (#4), Qwen1.5-7B: 29.6 (#293)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Qwen1.5-7B
LMArena Text14761083
LMArena Creative Writing14541035
LMArena Multi-Turn14881062
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2082—
EQ-Bench 41339—

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K3 better than Qwen1.5-7B?

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Kimi K3 or Qwen1.5-7B better for coding?

Kimi K3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 61.0 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K3 and Qwen1.5-7B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K3 has 53 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-7B has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper