Model comparison

Kimi K3 vs Wizardlm 13b

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Kimi K3 Moonshot AI

59.5

Rank #15 Confirmed

Wizardlm 13b Microsoft

31.4

Rank #274 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K3 scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K3 leads 76.6 to 30.5.

Side by side

Kimi K3 and Wizardlm 13b specifications
Kimi K3Wizardlm 13b
ProviderMoonshot AIMicrosoft
Noometry Index59.531.4
Released2026-07-16—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output1.05M—
Input $ / M tokens$3—
Output $ / M tokens$15—
Results tracked5310

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 61.0 (#10), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Coding15081035
DeepSWE68.5%—
FrontierCode44.2%—
LMArena WebDev1654—
FrontierSWE25.9%—
SciCode59.5%—
WeirdML82.6%—
ALE-Bench1,524—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Kimi K3: 41.8 (#20), Wizardlm 13b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Wizardlm 13b
APEX-Agents50.6%—
τ²-bench Banking37.1%—
PostTrainBench32%—
GBAEval48.3%—
GDP.pdf19%—
Vending-Bench 25,165—

Reasoning Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 63.0 (#17), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Hard Prompts14961018
ARC-AGI-260.4%—
SimpleBench60.7%—
NYT Connections (extended)93.6%—
ARC-AGI-194.5%—
CritPt23.4%—
Chess Puzzles39%—
Mystery Game Puzzles26%—
DTBench91.2%—
LMCA52.7%—
Surface Evolver Bench95%—
Epoch Capabilities Index157.45—
ForecastBench61.1—

Math Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 74.2 (#16), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Math14911017
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)72.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 439%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions87.8%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.2%—
ProofBench87%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Kimi K3: 63.2 (#21), Wizardlm 13b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Wizardlm 13b
GPQA Diamond93.1%—
SimpleQA Verified50.6%—
LMArena Expert1521—

Multimodal Not comparable

Kimi K3: 37.8 (#70), Wizardlm 13b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Wizardlm 13b
Blueprint-Bench 229.5%—
Furniture Assembly34.2%—

Multilingual Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 56.3 (#21), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Non-English14661034
LMArena Chinese15291023
LMArena French1491—
LMArena German1488—
LMArena Japanese1487—
LMArena Korean1458—
LMArena Russian1482—
LMArena Spanish1472—

Instruction Following Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 77.7 (#14), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Instruction Following14831048

Long Context Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 45.8 (#29), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Longer Query14941054

Writing & Preference Kimi K3 leads

Kimi K3: 76.6 (#4), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkKimi K3Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Text14761077
LMArena Creative Writing14541091
LMArena Multi-Turn14881047
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2082—
EQ-Bench 41339—

Frequently asked questions

Is Kimi K3 better than Wizardlm 13b?

Kimi K3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Kimi K3 or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Kimi K3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 61.0 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Kimi K3 and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K3 has 53 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper