Model comparison

Llama 13b vs Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Llama 13b Meta

24.4

Rank #348 Confirmed

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct Microsoft

29.3

Rank #314 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 13b scores higher in 0 categories and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct in 6 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads 31.1 to 13.8.

Side by side

Llama 13b and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct specifications
Llama 13bPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
ProviderMetaMicrosoft
Noometry Index24.429.3
Released2023-02-242024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2132

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads

Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.9 (#318)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Coding6831101
LiveBench Coding—20.3%

Reasoning Too close to call

Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.8 (#323)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts7281100
BIG-Bench Hard37.9%79.1%
HellaSwag79.2%77%
WinoGrande73%81.5%
LiveBench Reasoning—15.9%
LiveBench Data Analysis—30.3%
Adversarial NLI—58.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index100.58—
LAMBADA75.2%—
LiveBench—24%
PIQA80.1%—

Math Too close to call

Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.6 (#248)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Math8381151
LiveBench Math—17.6%
GSM8K20.6%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 29.1 (#240)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
ARC (AI2) Challenge52.7%90.7%
MMLU47.7%75.7%
OpenBookQA56.4%88%
TriviaQA77.9%58.1%
LMArena Expert—1067
BoolQ78.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
ScienceQA43.3%—

Multilingual Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads

Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#272)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Non-English8191058
LMArena Chinese—1061
LMArena French—1135
LMArena German—1080
LMArena Japanese—966
LMArena Korean—894
LMArena Russian—1111
LMArena Spanish—1111

Instruction Following Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads

Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 51.9 (#292)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following7811087
LiveBench Instruction Following—47.2%

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 13b: —, Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#267)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1088

Writing & Preference Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads

Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.1 (#284)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 13bPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Text8341110
LMArena Creative Writing7941083
LMArena Multi-Turn7531068
LiveBench Language—12.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 13b better than Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct?

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 13b or Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better for coding?

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 27.9 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 13b and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 13b has 21 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper