Model comparison

Llama 2-70B vs Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.8 to 24.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 24 shared benchmarks.

Llama 2-70B Meta

24.1

Rank #343 Confirmed

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct Microsoft

28.8

Rank #310 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 24 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-70B scores higher in 3 categories and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads 28.5 to 7.4.

Side by side

Llama 2-70B and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct specifications
Llama 2-70BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
ProviderMetaMicrosoft
Noometry Index24.128.8
Released2023-07-182024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3532

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Llama 2-70B leads

Llama 2-70B: 30.8 (#281), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.4 (#313)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Coding10791102
LiveBench Coding—20.3%

Reasoning Too close to call

Llama 2-70B: 13.7 (#324), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.2 (#319)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10731100
BIG-Bench Hard64.9%79.1%
HellaSwag85.3%77%
WinoGrande80.2%81.5%
LiveBench Reasoning—15.9%
DTBench41.6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—30.3%
Adversarial NLI—58.1%
CommonsenseQA 2.050%—
Epoch Capabilities Index113.59—
ForecastBench51.4—
LAMBADA78.9%—
LiveBench—24%
PIQA82.8%—

Math Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads

Llama 2-70B: 7.5 (#320), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 25.4 (#247)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Math10911151
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20250%—
LiveBench Math—17.6%
MATH Level 53.3%—
GSM8K69.6%—

Knowledge Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads

Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#305), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#237)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Expert10391067
ARC (AI2) Challenge78.3%90.7%
MMLU69.9%75.7%
OpenBookQA60.2%88%
TriviaQA87.6%58.1%
GPQA Diamond26.3%—
BoolQ88.6%—

Multilingual Too close to call

Llama 2-70B: 27.9 (#269), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.6 (#267)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Non-English10451058
LMArena Chinese9941061
LMArena French10891134
LMArena German10411080
LMArena Japanese927966
LMArena Korean964894
LMArena Russian10831111
LMArena Spanish11421111

Instruction Following Llama 2-70B leads

Llama 2-70B: 55.1 (#273), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 52.2 (#287)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10711087
LiveBench Instruction Following—47.2%

Long Context Too close to call

Llama 2-70B: 32.2 (#265), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#262)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query10621088

Writing & Preference Llama 2-70B leads

Llama 2-70B: 32.5 (#274), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.3 (#279)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 2-70BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Text11151110
LMArena Creative Writing10751083
LMArena Multi-Turn10881068
LiveBench Language—12.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 2-70B better than Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct?

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.8 to 24.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 2-70B or Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better for coding?

Llama 2-70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.8 versus 27.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 2-70B and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct share?

24 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-70B has 35 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper