Model comparison

Llama 3.1-405B vs Qwen3 Coder Next

Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.8 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3.1-405B Meta

30.4

Rank #279 Confirmed

Qwen3 Coder Next Alibaba (Qwen)

33.8

Rank #229 Reported

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Llama 3.1-405B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 Coder Next in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3 Coder Next leads 21.7 to 16.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 21.4% for Llama 3.1-405B and 34.4% for Qwen3 Coder Next.

Side by side

Llama 3.1-405B and Qwen3 Coder Next specifications
Llama 3.1-405BQwen3 Coder Next
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.433.8
Released2024-07-232026-02-02
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.12
Output $ / M tokens—$0.80
Results tracked423

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 Coder Next leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 32.7 (#257), Qwen3 Coder Next: 35.8 (#206)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen3 Coder Next
WeirdML21.4%34.4%
SciCode—32.3%
LMArena Coding1291—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama 3.1-405B: 20.9 (#131), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen3 Coder Next
TheAgentCompany7.4%—
Cybench7.5%—

Reasoning Qwen3 Coder Next leads

Llama 3.1-405B: 16.4 (#293), Qwen3 Coder Next: 21.7 (#191)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen3 Coder Next
SimpleBench23%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark45%—
CritPt—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts1270—
DTBench61.4%—
BIG-Bench Hard82.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index128.76—
ForecastBench59.9—
HellaSwag89.2%—
PIQA85.9%—
WinoGrande89.2%—

Math Not comparable

Llama 3.1-405B: 17.3 (#283), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen3 Coder Next
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20259.7%—
Omni-MATH24.9%—
LMArena Math1281—
MATH Level 549.8%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama 3.1-405B: 30.4 (#221), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen3 Coder Next
GPQA Diamond50.9%—
MMLU-Pro72.3%—
Confabulations17.6%—
GPQA (HELM)52.2%—
LMArena Expert1243—
ARC (AI2) Challenge95.3%—
MMLU84.5%—
TriviaQA82.7%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Llama 3.1-405B: 40.9 (#209), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Non-English1248—
LMArena Chinese1242—
LMArena French1278—
LMArena German1252—
LMArena Japanese1208—
LMArena Korean1184—
LMArena Russian1265—
LMArena Spanish1259—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Llama 3.1-405B: 66.1 (#209), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen3 Coder Next
IFEval81.1%—
LMArena Instruction Following1259—

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 3.1-405B: 38.4 (#192), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Longer Query1266—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Llama 3.1-405B: 39.1 (#246), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1-405BQwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Text1284—
LMArena Creative Writing1262—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing870—
WildBench78.3%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1297—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.1-405B better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.8 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3.1-405B or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?

Qwen3 Coder Next scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 32.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1-405B and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Llama 3.1-405B has 42 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper