Model comparison

Phi-4 Mini vs Qwen3 Coder Next

Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.8 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index. Phi-4 Mini costs 2.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 Coder Next's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Phi-4 Mini Microsoft

30.4

Rank #280 Reported

Qwen3 Coder Next Alibaba (Qwen)

33.8

Rank #229 Reported

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi-4 Mini scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 Coder Next in 2 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3 Coder Next leads 35.8 to 27.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 10.8% for Phi-4 Mini and 32.3% for Qwen3 Coder Next.
  • Phi-4 Mini is cheaper at $0.075 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.12 / $0.80 for Qwen3 Coder Next.
  • Qwen3 Coder Next accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Phi-4 Mini and Qwen3 Coder Next specifications
Phi-4 MiniQwen3 Coder Next
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.433.8
Released2024-12-112026-02-02
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K262K
Max output4K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.075$0.12
Output $ / M tokens$0.30$0.80
Results tracked33

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 Coder Next leads

Phi-4 Mini: 27.6 (#312), Qwen3 Coder Next: 35.8 (#206)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4 MiniQwen3 Coder Next
SciCode10.8%32.3%
WeirdML—34.4%

Reasoning Too close to call

Phi-4 Mini: 21.7 (#190), Qwen3 Coder Next: 21.7 (#191)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4 MiniQwen3 Coder Next
CritPt0%0%

Knowledge Not comparable

Phi-4 Mini: 24.8 (#261), Qwen3 Coder Next: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-4 MiniQwen3 Coder Next
Vectara Hallucination Rate23.5%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi-4 Mini better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.8 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index. Phi-4 Mini costs 2.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 Coder Next's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Phi-4 Mini or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Phi-4 Mini is cheaper. It lists at $0.075 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder Next lists at $0.12 and $0.80.

Is Phi-4 Mini or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?

Qwen3 Coder Next scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 27.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 Coder Next does, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Phi-4 Mini and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-4 Mini has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper