Model comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct vs Qwen3 14B
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct and Qwen3 14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (35.9 vs 35.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIA
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 14B leads 39.3 to 31.9.
Side by side
| Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Qwen3 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 35.5 |
| Released | — | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.35 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.40 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3 14B leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 35.6 (#222), Qwen3 14B: 37.3 (#195)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1223 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: —, Qwen3 14B: 29.6 (#83)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 41% |
Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 23.5 (#177), Qwen3 14B: 18.5 (#280)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.1% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1203 | — |
| DTBench | — | 64% |
| LMCA | — | 18.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.23 |
Math Qwen3 14B leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 34.6 (#193), Qwen3 14B: 38.6 (#133)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1230 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3 14B leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 31.9 (#218), Qwen3 14B: 39.3 (#134)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 63.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1167 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.1 (#241), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1181 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1180 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1187 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 62.9 (#233), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1201 | — |
Long Context Qwen3 14B leads
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.5 (#230), Qwen3 14B: 38.1 (#204)
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.5% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1205 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 43.4 (#229), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1228 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1213 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1227 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct better than Qwen3 14B?
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct and Qwen3 14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (35.9 vs 35.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct or Qwen3 14B better for coding?
Qwen3 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.3 versus 35.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct and Qwen3 14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.