Model comparison

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct vs Qwen3 14B

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct and Qwen3 14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (35.9 vs 35.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.9

Rank #223 Confirmed

Qwen3 14B Alibaba (Qwen)

35.5

Rank #225 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 14B leads 39.3 to 32.0.

Side by side

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct and Qwen3 14B specifications
Nemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3 14B
ProviderNVIDIAAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index35.935.5
Released2024-06-142025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.35
Output $ / M tokens—$1.40
Results tracked1712

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 14B leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228), Qwen3 14B: 37.3 (#195)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3 14B
SciCode—31.6%
LMArena Coding1209—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: —, Qwen3 14B: 29.6 (#83)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3 14B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—41%

Reasoning Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178), Qwen3 14B: 18.5 (#280)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3 14B
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.1%
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles—4%
LMArena Hard Prompts1202—
DTBench—64%
LMCA—18.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—138.23

Math Qwen3 14B leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195), Qwen3 14B: 38.6 (#133)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3 14B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—66.4%
LMArena Math1216—

Knowledge Qwen3 14B leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216), Qwen3 14B: 39.3 (#134)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3 14B
GPQA Diamond—63.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.4%
LMArena Expert1171—

Multilingual Not comparable

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233), Qwen3 14B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3 14B
LMArena Non-English1206—
LMArena Chinese1214—
LMArena French1197—
LMArena German1192—
LMArena Japanese1128—
LMArena Korean1148—
LMArena Russian1219—
LMArena Spanish1195—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232), Qwen3 14B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3 14B
LMArena Instruction Following1203—

Long Context Too close to call

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221), Qwen3 14B: 38.1 (#204)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3 14B
Fiction.LiveBench—62.5%
LMArena Longer Query1225—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233), Qwen3 14B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3 14B
LMArena Text1225—
LMArena Creative Writing1203—
LMArena Multi-Turn1214—

Frequently asked questions

Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better than Qwen3 14B?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct and Qwen3 14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (35.9 vs 35.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct or Qwen3 14B better for coding?

Qwen3 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.3 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Nemotron 4 340b Instruct and Qwen3 14B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper