Model comparison

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct vs Phi-3.5-MoE

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#291); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct Meta

30.6

Rank #291 Confirmed

Phi-3.5-MoE Microsoft

—

Unranked

Side by side

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct and Phi-3.5-MoE specifications
Llama-3.3-70B-InstructPhi-3.5-MoE
ProviderMetaMicrosoft
Noometry Index30.6—
Released2024-12-062024-08-17
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.10—
Output $ / M tokens$0.32—
Results tracked433

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 31.0 (#290), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama-3.3-70B-InstructPhi-3.5-MoE
SciCode26%—
WeirdML14.4%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46.9%—
LiveBench Coding36.6%—
LMArena Coding1268—
BigCodeBench Complete57.5%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 25.8 (#105), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama-3.3-70B-InstructPhi-3.5-MoE
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard31.9%—
BALROG23%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 14.1 (#327), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama-3.3-70B-InstructPhi-3.5-MoE
SimpleBench19.9%—
CritPt0%—
LiveBench Reasoning50.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1257—
DTBench59.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis49.5%—
LMCA17.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index127.33—
ForecastBench58.6—
LiveBench50.2%—
PIQA—88.6%

Math Not comparable

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 15.3 (#298), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama-3.3-70B-InstructPhi-3.5-MoE
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20255.1%—
LiveBench Math42.2%—
LMArena Math1267—
MATH Level 541.6%—
GSM8K—88.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 30.6 (#226), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama-3.3-70B-InstructPhi-3.5-MoE
GPQA Diamond47.4%—
Confabulations22.8%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate4.1%—
LMArena Expert1225—
BoolQ—84.6%
MMLU86.3%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 39.9 (#220), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama-3.3-70B-InstructPhi-3.5-MoE
LMArena Non-English1236—
LMArena Chinese1217—
LMArena French1281—
LMArena German1251—
LMArena Japanese1150—
LMArena Korean1143—
LMArena Russian1252—
LMArena Spanish1270—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 71.1 (#157), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama-3.3-70B-InstructPhi-3.5-MoE
LiveBench Instruction Following82.7%—
LMArena Instruction Following1242—

Long Context Not comparable

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 26.4 (#295), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama-3.3-70B-InstructPhi-3.5-MoE
Fiction.LiveBench33.3%—
LMArena Longer Query1256—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 47.6 (#207), Phi-3.5-MoE: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama-3.3-70B-InstructPhi-3.5-MoE
LMArena Text1274—
LMArena Creative Writing1250—
LMArena Multi-Turn1280—
LiveBench Language39.2%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct better than Phi-3.5-MoE?

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#291); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct and Phi-3.5-MoE share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct has 43 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-MoE has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper