Model comparison

Llama 3-70B vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Llama 3-70B and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (28.8 vs 29.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Llama 3-70B Meta

28.8

Rank #323 Confirmed

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Alibaba (Qwen)

29.0

Rank #320 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3-70B scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads 48.8 to 42.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 54.5% for Llama 3-70B and 46.1% for Qwen2.5 7B Instruct.

Side by side

Llama 3-70B and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct specifications
Llama 3-70BQwen2.5 7B Instruct
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index28.829.0
Released2024-04-182024-09
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.17
Output $ / M tokens—$0.70
Results tracked3115

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 36.5 (#208)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BQwen2.5 7B Instruct
BigCodeBench Instruct43.6%37.6%
BigCodeBench Complete54.5%46.1%
LMArena Coding1206—
HumanEval+72%—
MBPP+69%—

Agentic & Tool Use Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads

Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.8 (#124)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BQwen2.5 7B Instruct
Cybench5%—
BALROG—7.8%

Reasoning Llama 3-70B leads

Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.8 (#322)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BQwen2.5 7B Instruct
DTBench54.2%47.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index122.93118.51
Kagi LLM Benchmark35.1%—
Chess Puzzles—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts1195—
LMCA—6.4%
ForecastBench57.1—
WinoGrande83.5%—

Math Too close to call

Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 12.6 (#306)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BQwen2.5 7B Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20254.3%2.5%
Omni-MATH—29.4%
LMArena Math1218—
MATH Level 522.6%—

Knowledge Llama 3-70B leads

Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#286)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BQwen2.5 7B Instruct
GPQA Diamond40.6%35.5%
MMLU79.3%72.9%
MMLU-Pro—53.9%
GPQA (HELM)—34.1%
LMArena Expert1149—

Multilingual Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BQwen2.5 7B Instruct
LMArena Non-English1142—
LMArena Chinese1114—
LMArena French1232—
LMArena German1169—
LMArena Japanese1017—
LMArena Korean1017—
LMArena Russian1159—
LMArena Spanish1241—

Instruction Following Too close to call

Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.2 (#231)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BQwen2.5 7B Instruct
IFEval—74.1%
LMArena Instruction Following1194—

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BQwen2.5 7B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1174—

Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads

Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#195)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3-70BQwen2.5 7B Instruct
LMArena Text1221—
LMArena Creative Writing1210—
WildBench—73.1%
LMArena Multi-Turn1223—

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3-70B better than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Llama 3-70B and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (28.8 vs 29.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Llama 3-70B or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (35.8 vs 36.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3-70B and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3-70B has 31 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper