Model comparison

Longcat Flash Chat vs Phi-4

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Longcat Flash Chat Meituan

41.5

Rank #121 Confirmed

Phi-4 Microsoft

30.9

Rank #269 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Longcat Flash Chat scores higher in 8 categories and Phi-4 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Longcat Flash Chat leads 61.2 to 40.7.

Side by side

Longcat Flash Chat and Phi-4 specifications
Longcat Flash ChatPhi-4
ProviderMeituanMicrosoft
Noometry Index41.530.9
Released—2024-12-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.07
Output $ / M tokens—$0.14
Results tracked1937

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 42.9 (#85), Phi-4: 33.8 (#237)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatPhi-4
LMArena Coding14711231
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.5%
LiveBench Coding—30.7%
BigCodeBench Complete—55.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Longcat Flash Chat: —, Phi-4: 22.6 (#120)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatPhi-4
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.8%
BALROG—11.6%

Reasoning Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 18.3 (#267), Phi-4: 17.0 (#287)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatPhi-4
LMArena Hard Prompts14401220
Kagi LLM Benchmark43.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)17.7%—
Chess Puzzles—1%
LiveBench Reasoning—47.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—45.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—130.43
LiveBench—41.6%

Math Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 36.6 (#107), Phi-4: 19.6 (#279)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatPhi-4
LMArena Math14411246
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—13.8%
LiveBench Math—42%
MATH Level 5—64.9%

Knowledge Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 40.0 (#111), Phi-4: 32.5 (#204)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatPhi-4
LMArena Expert14541203
GPQA Diamond—56.1%
Confabulations—29.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—3.7%
MMLU—84.8%

Multilingual Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 52.1 (#95), Phi-4: 37.4 (#232)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatPhi-4
LMArena Non-English14041197
LMArena Chinese14651211
LMArena French14571223
LMArena German14091222
LMArena Japanese13731158
LMArena Korean13721151
LMArena Russian13961209
LMArena Spanish14451234

Instruction Following Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 74.6 (#92), Phi-4: 60.6 (#246)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatPhi-4
LMArena Instruction Following14111201
LiveBench Instruction Following—58.4%

Long Context Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#89), Phi-4: 36.9 (#221)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatPhi-4
LMArena Longer Query14251217

Writing & Preference Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 61.2 (#88), Phi-4: 40.7 (#239)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatPhi-4
LMArena Text14271217
LMArena Creative Writing13881182
LMArena Multi-Turn14181206
Short-Story Creative Writing—62.6%
LiveBench Language—25.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is Longcat Flash Chat better than Phi-4?

Longcat Flash Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Longcat Flash Chat or Phi-4 better for coding?

Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Longcat Flash Chat and Phi-4 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Longcat Flash Chat has 19 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper