Noometry

Model comparison

Longcat Flash Chat vs Qwen3.5 122B-A10B

Longcat Flash Chat and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.1 vs 42.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Longcat Flash Chat Meituan

42.1

Rank #120 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B Alibaba (Qwen)

42.1

Rank #119 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Longcat Flash Chat scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads 27.2 to 19.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 17.7% for Longcat Flash Chat and 51.7% for Qwen3.5 122B-A10B.

Side by side

Longcat Flash ChatQwen3.5 122B-A10B
ProviderMeituanAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index42.142.1
Released—2026-02-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$3.20
Results tracked1927

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.1 (#162)

BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Coding14711436
LMArena WebDev—1360
SciCode—35.6%

Reasoning Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 27.2 (#123)

BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen3.5 122B-A10B
NYT Connections (extended)17.7%51.7%
LMArena Hard Prompts14401421
Kagi LLM Benchmark43.9%—
CritPt—0.9%
Thematic Generalization—51.2%
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—84.3%
LMCA—32.2%

Math Too close to call

Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.1 (#112)

BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Math14421432

Knowledge Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 38.8 (#142)

BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Expert14541432
Vectara Hallucination Rate—11.2%

Multimodal Not comparable

Longcat Flash Chat: —, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.6 (#57)

BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Vision—1245

Multilingual Too close to call

Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 51.6 (#107)

BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Non-English14041400
LMArena Chinese14651462
LMArena French14561442
LMArena German14081426
LMArena Japanese13731367
LMArena Korean13711352
LMArena Russian13951400
LMArena Spanish14451424

Instruction Following Too close to call

Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 73.8 (#115)

BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Instruction Following14111399

Long Context Too close to call

Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 43.0 (#109)

BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Longer Query14251410

Writing & Preference Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 60.0 (#105)

BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatQwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Text14271417
LMArena Creative Writing13881368
LMArena Multi-Turn14181416

Frequently asked questions

Is Longcat Flash Chat better than Qwen3.5 122B-A10B?

Longcat Flash Chat and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.1 vs 42.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Longcat Flash Chat or Qwen3.5 122B-A10B better for coding?

Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 39.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Longcat Flash Chat and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Longcat Flash Chat has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper