Noometry

Model comparison

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B vs Solar Pro4

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B and Solar Pro4 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.1 vs 42.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B Alibaba (Qwen)

42.1

Rank #119 Confirmed

Solar Pro4 Upstage

42.1

Rank #121 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.5 122B-A10B scores higher in 5 categories and Solar Pro4 in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads 60.0 to 56.5.
  • Solar Pro4 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $3.20 for Qwen3.5 122B-A10B.
  • Solar Pro4 accepts more context: 524K tokens versus 262K.
  • Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen3.5 122B-A10BSolar Pro4
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Upstage
Noometry Index42.142.1
Released2026-02-232026-08-06
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K524K
Max output66K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.40$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$3.20$1.20
Results tracked2718

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.1 (#162), Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)

BenchmarkQwen3.5 122B-A10BSolar Pro4
LMArena WebDev13601371
LMArena Coding14361437
SciCode35.6%—

Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 27.2 (#123), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)

BenchmarkQwen3.5 122B-A10BSolar Pro4
LMArena Hard Prompts14211399
NYT Connections (extended)51.7%—
CritPt0.9%—
Thematic Generalization51.2%—
Mystery Game Puzzles17%—
DTBench84.3%—
LMCA32.2%—

Math Too close to call

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.1 (#112), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)

BenchmarkQwen3.5 122B-A10BSolar Pro4
LMArena Math14321416

Knowledge Solar Pro4 leads

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 38.8 (#142), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)

BenchmarkQwen3.5 122B-A10BSolar Pro4
LMArena Expert14321427
Vectara Hallucination Rate11.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.6 (#57), Solar Pro4: —

BenchmarkQwen3.5 122B-A10BSolar Pro4
LMArena Vision1245—

Multilingual Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 51.6 (#107), Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)

BenchmarkQwen3.5 122B-A10BSolar Pro4
LMArena Non-English14001361
LMArena Chinese14621415
LMArena French14421397
LMArena German14261364
LMArena Japanese13671309
LMArena Korean13521382
LMArena Russian14001360
LMArena Spanish14241401

Instruction Following Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 73.8 (#115), Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)

BenchmarkQwen3.5 122B-A10BSolar Pro4
LMArena Instruction Following13991377

Long Context Too close to call

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 43.0 (#109), Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)

BenchmarkQwen3.5 122B-A10BSolar Pro4
LMArena Longer Query14101381

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 60.0 (#105), Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)

BenchmarkQwen3.5 122B-A10BSolar Pro4
LMArena Text14171386
LMArena Creative Writing13681316
LMArena Multi-Turn14161385

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.5 122B-A10B better than Solar Pro4?

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B and Solar Pro4 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.1 vs 42.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B or Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 122B-A10B lists at $0.40 and $3.20.

Is Qwen3.5 122B-A10B or Solar Pro4 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (39.1 vs 40.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.

Which has the bigger context window?

Solar Pro4 does, with 524K tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.5 122B-A10B and Solar Pro4 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper