Model comparison
Magistral Small vs Qwen1.5-32B
Magistral Small and Qwen1.5-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.2 vs 30.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Magistral Small scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen1.5-32B in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Magistral Small leads 30.9 to 13.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 56.1% for Magistral Small and 30.7% for Qwen1.5-32B.
Side by side
| Magistral Small | Qwen1.5-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.2 | 30.5 |
| Released | 2025-06-10 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 40K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 10 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Magistral Small leads
Magistral Small: 38.4 (#176), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.7 (#282)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 35.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.3% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1155 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 42% |
Reasoning Qwen1.5-32B leads
Magistral Small: 6.8 (#350), Qwen1.5-32B: 21.8 (#212)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 6.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 5% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1130 |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.19 | — |
Math Qwen1.5-32B leads
Magistral Small: 26.2 (#261), Qwen1.5-32B: 33.0 (#207)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 30% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1155 |
Knowledge Magistral Small leads
Magistral Small: 30.9 (#223), Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#296)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 56.1% | 30.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1126 |
| MMLU | — | 74.4% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Magistral Small: —, Qwen1.5-32B: 31.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1106 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1177 |
| LMArena French | — | 1101 |
| LMArena German | — | 1058 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1027 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1008 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1073 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1089 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Magistral Small: —, Qwen1.5-32B: 57.7 (#265)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1116 |
Long Context Not comparable
Magistral Small: —, Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#246)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1146 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Magistral Small: —, Qwen1.5-32B: 34.2 (#271)
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1137 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1140 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Magistral Small better than Qwen1.5-32B?
Magistral Small and Qwen1.5-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.2 vs 30.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Magistral Small or Qwen1.5-32B better for coding?
Magistral Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Magistral Small and Qwen1.5-32B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Magistral Small has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.