Model comparison
Olmo 7b Instruct vs Qwen1.5-32B
Olmo 7b Instruct and Qwen1.5-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.3 vs 30.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 7b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen1.5-32B in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Qwen1.5-32B leads 57.7 to 49.0.
Side by side
| Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.3 | 30.5 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 10 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen1.5-32B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.7 (#282)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1016 | 1155 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.3% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 42% |
Reasoning Qwen1.5-32B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274), Qwen1.5-32B: 21.8 (#212)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 993 | 1130 |
Math Qwen1.5-32B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237), Qwen1.5-32B: 33.0 (#207)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1018 | 1155 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: —, Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#296)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 30.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1126 |
| MMLU | — | 74.4% |
Multilingual Qwen1.5-32B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 977 | 1106 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1014 | 1177 |
| LMArena Russian | 947 | 1073 |
| LMArena French | — | 1101 |
| LMArena German | — | 1058 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1027 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1008 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1089 |
Instruction Following Qwen1.5-32B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301), Qwen1.5-32B: 57.7 (#265)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 978 | 1116 |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: —, Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#246)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1146 |
Writing & Preference Qwen1.5-32B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.2 (#271)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1032 | 1137 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 990 | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1007 | 1140 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 7b Instruct better than Qwen1.5-32B?
Olmo 7b Instruct and Qwen1.5-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.3 vs 30.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Olmo 7b Instruct or Qwen1.5-32B better for coding?
Qwen1.5-32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.7 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 7b Instruct and Qwen1.5-32B share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 7b Instruct has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.