Model comparison

Magistral Small vs Qwen2-72B

Magistral Small and Qwen2-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.2 vs 30.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Magistral Small Mistral AI

30.2

Rank #296 Confirmed

Qwen2-72B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.0

Rank #300 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Magistral Small scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen2-72B in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen2-72B leads 23.2 to 6.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 56.1% for Magistral Small and 40.8% for Qwen2-72B.

Side by side

Magistral Small and Qwen2-72B specifications
Magistral SmallQwen2-72B
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.230.0
Released2025-06-102024-06-07
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output40K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.50—
Output $ / M tokens$1.50—
Results tracked1026

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Magistral Small leads

Magistral Small: 38.4 (#176), Qwen2-72B: 29.1 (#310)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallQwen2-72B
SciCode35.2%—
WeirdML—11.3%
BigCodeBench Instruct—38.5%
LMArena Coding—1196
BigCodeBench Complete—54%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, Qwen2-72B: 17.0 (#146)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallQwen2-72B
TheAgentCompany—1.1%
METR Time Horizons—29.9%

Reasoning Qwen2-72B leads

Magistral Small: 6.8 (#350), Qwen2-72B: 23.2 (#181)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallQwen2-72B
Epoch Capabilities Index133.19125.28
ARC-AGI-20%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark6.3%—
ARC-AGI-15%—
CritPt0.3%—
Chess Puzzles3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1191
DTBench61.3%—

Math Qwen2-72B leads

Magistral Small: 26.2 (#261), Qwen2-72B: 30.2 (#236)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallQwen2-72B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202530%—
LMArena Math—1235
MATH Level 5—39.1%

Knowledge Magistral Small leads

Magistral Small: 30.9 (#223), Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#275)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallQwen2-72B
GPQA Diamond56.1%40.8%
LMArena Expert—1171
MMLU—82.4%

Multilingual Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, Qwen2-72B: 35.9 (#244)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallQwen2-72B
LMArena Non-English—1176
LMArena Chinese—1240
LMArena French—1170
LMArena German—1151
LMArena Japanese—1111
LMArena Korean—1083
LMArena Russian—1169
LMArena Spanish—1169

Instruction Following Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, Qwen2-72B: 61.7 (#241)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallQwen2-72B
LMArena Instruction Following—1181

Long Context Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#235)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallQwen2-72B
LMArena Longer Query—1192

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Magistral Small: —, Qwen2-72B: 40.8 (#241)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMagistral SmallQwen2-72B
LMArena Text—1203
LMArena Creative Writing—1181
LMArena Multi-Turn—1196

Frequently asked questions

Is Magistral Small better than Qwen2-72B?

Magistral Small and Qwen2-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.2 vs 30.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Magistral Small or Qwen2-72B better for coding?

Magistral Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Magistral Small and Qwen2-72B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Magistral Small has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.

Related comparisons

Go deeper