Model comparison

Olmo 7b Instruct vs Qwen2-72B

Olmo 7b Instruct and Qwen2-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.3 vs 30.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Qwen2-72B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.0

Rank #300 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 7b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Qwen2-72B in 5 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2-72B leads 40.8 to 25.8.

Side by side

Olmo 7b Instruct and Qwen2-72B specifications
Olmo 7b InstructQwen2-72B
ProviderAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.330.0
Released—2024-06-07
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1026

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303), Qwen2-72B: 29.1 (#310)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 7b InstructQwen2-72B
LMArena Coding10161196
WeirdML—11.3%
BigCodeBench Instruct—38.5%
BigCodeBench Complete—54%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Olmo 7b Instruct: —, Qwen2-72B: 17.0 (#146)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 7b InstructQwen2-72B
TheAgentCompany—1.1%
METR Time Horizons—29.9%

Reasoning Qwen2-72B leads

Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274), Qwen2-72B: 23.2 (#181)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 7b InstructQwen2-72B
LMArena Hard Prompts9931191
Epoch Capabilities Index—125.28

Math Too close to call

Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237), Qwen2-72B: 30.2 (#236)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 7b InstructQwen2-72B
LMArena Math10181235
MATH Level 5—39.1%

Knowledge Not comparable

Olmo 7b Instruct: —, Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#275)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 7b InstructQwen2-72B
GPQA Diamond—40.8%
LMArena Expert—1171
MMLU—82.4%

Multilingual Qwen2-72B leads

Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291), Qwen2-72B: 35.9 (#244)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 7b InstructQwen2-72B
LMArena Non-English9771176
LMArena Chinese10141240
LMArena Russian9471169
LMArena French—1170
LMArena German—1151
LMArena Japanese—1111
LMArena Korean—1083
LMArena Spanish—1169

Instruction Following Qwen2-72B leads

Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301), Qwen2-72B: 61.7 (#241)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 7b InstructQwen2-72B
LMArena Instruction Following9781181

Long Context Not comparable

Olmo 7b Instruct: —, Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#235)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 7b InstructQwen2-72B
LMArena Longer Query—1192

Writing & Preference Qwen2-72B leads

Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303), Qwen2-72B: 40.8 (#241)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 7b InstructQwen2-72B
LMArena Text10321203
LMArena Creative Writing9901181
LMArena Multi-Turn10071196

Frequently asked questions

Is Olmo 7b Instruct better than Qwen2-72B?

Olmo 7b Instruct and Qwen2-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.3 vs 30.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Olmo 7b Instruct or Qwen2-72B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (29.6 vs 29.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Olmo 7b Instruct and Qwen2-72B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 7b Instruct has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.

Related comparisons

Go deeper