Model comparison
MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview
MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Qwen3.5 Max Preview score almost the same on the Noometry Index (45.2 vs 45.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 4 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 30.8 to 26.8.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 45.2 | 45.3 |
| Released | 2026-04-22 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | — |
| Results tracked | 27 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1503 | 1487 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1479 | — |
| SciCode | 50.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 899.8 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1488 | 1483 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 34.4% | — |
| CritPt | 4% | — |
| DTBench | 84.5% | — |
| LMCA | 29.5% | — |
Math Too close to call
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1474 |
| ProofBench | 22% | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1503 | 1489 |
Multilingual Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1449 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1534 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | 1484 |
| LMArena German | 1458 | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1412 | 1495 |
| LMArena Korean | 1437 | 1438 |
| LMArena Russian | 1450 | 1471 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1471 | 1470 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1477 | 1467 |
Long Context Too close to call
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1483 | 1476 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1465 | 1470 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1477 | 1478 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1493 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1208 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Qwen3.5 Max Preview score almost the same on the Noometry Index (45.2 vs 45.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 44.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.