Model comparison
MiMo-V2.5 vs MiniMax-M3
MiMo-V2.5 and MiniMax-M3 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.4 vs 43.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 23 shared benchmarks.
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 23 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5 scores higher in 2 categories and MiniMax-M3 in 7 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M3 leads 58.4 to 40.8.
- MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for MiniMax-M3.
- MiMo-V2.5 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.5 | MiniMax-M3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 43.4 | 43.8 |
| Released | 2026-04-22 | 2026-06-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Max output | 131K | 512K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 23 | 41 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81), MiniMax-M3: 41.8 (#118)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1438 | 1482 |
| SciCode | 43.1% | 47.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1469 | 1469 |
| ALE-Bench | 513.95 | 640.02 |
| FrontierCode | — | 14.7% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5: —, MiniMax-M3: 22.6 (#130)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 37.7% |
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 4.6% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 2,158 |
Reasoning MiniMax-M3 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101), MiniMax-M3: 30.1 (#87)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 3.7% | 3.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1450 | 1447 |
| SimpleBench | — | 45.8% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 65.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 14% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 8% |
| DTBench | — | 78.9% |
| LMCA | — | 33.7% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 55% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.95 |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.4 |
Math MiniMax-M3 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163), MiniMax-M3: 40.0 (#95)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 16% | 18% |
| LMArena Math | 1436 | 1429 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 71.1% |
Knowledge MiniMax-M3 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115), MiniMax-M3: 58.4 (#35)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | 1461 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 90.9% |
Multimodal Too close to call
MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54), MiniMax-M3: 40.2 (#51)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1247 | 1253 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1435 |
Multilingual MiniMax-M3 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99), MiniMax-M3: 53.0 (#75)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1420 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1468 | 1463 |
| LMArena French | 1447 | 1447 |
| LMArena German | 1421 | 1426 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1306 | 1381 |
| LMArena Korean | 1363 | 1372 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 1428 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1416 | 1432 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60), MiniMax-M3: 75.5 (#62)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1434 | 1433 |
Long Context Too close to call
MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73), MiniMax-M3: 44.2 (#72)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1445 | 1445 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86), MiniMax-M3: 62.1 (#83)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1428 | 1433 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1393 | 1404 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1442 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1150 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.5 better than MiniMax-M3?
MiMo-V2.5 and MiniMax-M3 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.4 vs 43.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.5 or MiniMax-M3?
MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; MiniMax-M3 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.
Is MiMo-V2.5 or MiniMax-M3 better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.5 does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5 and MiniMax-M3 share?
23 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5 has 23 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M3 has 41.