Model comparison

MiMo-V2.5 vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.5 Xiaomi

43.0

Rank #89 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 40.2 to 19.2.

Side by side

MiMo-V2.5 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct specifications
MiMo-V2.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
ProviderXiaomiAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index43.032.2
Released2026-04-22—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.14—
Output $ / M tokens$0.28—
Results tracked2316

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 43.6 (#75), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding14691210
LMArena WebDev1438—
SciCode43.1%—
ALE-Bench513.95—

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 27.8 (#98), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14501208
CritPt3.7%—

Math MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 35.4 (#145), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Math14361208
ProofBench16%—
Omni-MATH—16.1%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 40.2 (#109), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
MMLU-Pro—41.4%
GPQA (HELM)—28.7%
LMArena Expert1459—

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2.5: 39.0 (#53), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Vision1245—

Multilingual MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 52.0 (#96), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English14041160
LMArena Chinese14671192
LMArena Russian13951187
LMArena French1447—
LMArena German1421—
LMArena Japanese1304—
LMArena Korean1363—
LMArena Spanish1412—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 75.7 (#55), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14331186
IFEval—78%

Long Context MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 44.1 (#69), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14441194

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5 leads

MiMo-V2.5: 61.8 (#82), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.5Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
LMArena Text14271218
LMArena Creative Writing13921199
LMArena Multi-Turn14451221
WildBench—73.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2.5 better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiMo-V2.5 or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5 and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5 has 23 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper