Model comparison
MiMo-V2.5 vs Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5 scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 61.8 to 34.3.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.5 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 43.0 | 32.4 |
| Released | 2026-04-22 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 23 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 43.6 (#75), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.3 (#263)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1469 | 1130 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1438 | — |
| SciCode | 43.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 513.95 | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 27.8 (#98), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 20.8 (#214)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1450 | 1127 |
| CritPt | 3.7% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 35.4 (#145), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.9 (#202)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1436 | 1173 |
| ProofBench | 16% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 40.2 (#109), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 29.6 (#226)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1459 | 1108 |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5: 39.0 (#53), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1245 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 52.0 (#96), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.8 (#258)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1094 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1467 | 1108 |
| LMArena French | 1447 | 1109 |
| LMArena German | 1421 | 1101 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1304 | 1042 |
| LMArena Korean | 1363 | 954 |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | 1145 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1412 | 1095 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 75.7 (#55), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.8 (#263)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1433 | 1114 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 44.1 (#69), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.9 (#250)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1444 | 1120 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 61.8 (#82), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.3 (#267)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1427 | 1138 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1106 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1088 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.5 better than Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct?
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2.5 or Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5 and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5 has 23 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17.